Relationship between bid preparation audit and service delivery in the education sector of Central Equatoria State, South Sudan. A cross-sectional study.

Authors

  • David Garang Gongich School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Team University.
  • Fred Kisule School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Team University.
  • kateregga salongo School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Team University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/insights.v2i10.41

Keywords:

Bid Preparation Audit, Service Delivery, Central Equatoria State, South Sudan

Abstract

Background:

Bid preparation, audit, and service delivery in the education sector are closely linked through ensuring transparency, accountability, and efficiency in procurement processes. This study aims to determine the relationship between bid preparation audit and service delivery in the education sector of Central Equatoria State, South Sudan.

 Methodology:

A descriptive cross-sectional design. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 103 from a population of 140 employees. Data was collected using questionnaires, interviews, and documentary review. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the various demographic variables. Correlation and Linear regression analysis techniques were used to determine the relationship between bid preparation and service delivery.

 Results:

This study included 103 respondents, 3(3.5%) of the respondents who had a diploma as their highest level of education, 19(18.6) had a degree, 69(67.4) had a postgraduate degree, and 11(10.5) had other qualifications. 2 (2.9%) who had worked for 1-4 years, the respondents had adequate experience with procurement audit and service delivery in the entity, since about 98% had worked for more than 5 years with the central Equatoria state. Most of the respondents agreed that there was a significant correlation, r=0.339, p = 0.000. Linear regression analysis showed that 11.1% of the variability in service delivery (R² = .111) was explained by the bid preparatory process audit.

 Conclusion:

The bid preparation process audit significantly affects service delivery, especially when the audit recommendations cover procurement planning, bid management, bid opening, and bid document implementation by management.

 Recommendation:

The accounting officer should conduct a market price survey to guide the development of the procurement budget.

Author Biographies

David Garang Gongich, School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Team University.

holds a Master's degree in Procurement and Logistics Management from Team University.

Fred Kisule, School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Team University.

is a lecturer at Team University.

References

Agaba, E., & Shipman, N. (2007). Public procurement reform in developing countries: The Ugandan experience. In G. Piga & K. Thai (Eds.), Advancing public procurement: Practices, innovation and knowledge-sharing (pp. 373–391). PrAcademics Press.

Ambe, I. M., & Badenhorst-Weiss, J. A. (2012). Procurement challenges in the South African public sector. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v6i1.63

Hui, W. S., Othman, R. O., Omar, N. H., Rahman, R. A., & Haron, N. H. (2011). Procurement issues in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(6), 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111163666

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2006). The role of auditing in public sector governance. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Zubcic, J., & Sims, R. (2011). Examining the link between enforcement activity and corporate compliance by Australian companies and the implications for regulators. International Journal of Law and Management, 53(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431111147846

Hunja, R. R. (2003). Obstacles to public procurement reform in developing countries. In S. Arrowsmith & M. Trybus (Eds.), Public procurement: The continuing revolution (pp. 13–22). Kluwer Law International.

Hui, W. S., Othman, R. O., Omar, N. H., Rahman, R. A., & Haron, N. H. (2011). Procurement issues in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(6), https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111163666

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). OECD principles for integrity in public procurement. OECD Publishing.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority (PPDA). (2013). Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act. Government of South Sudan.

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority (PPDA). (2016). Public Procurement and Disposal Regulations. Government of South Sudan.

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority (PPDA). (2021). Audit report on Central Equatoria State. Government of South Sudan.

Thai, K. V. (2004). Introduction to public procurement. In K. V. Thai (Ed.), Introduction to public procurement (pp. 1–22). PrAcademics Press.

Walker, H., & Keniger, A. (2002). Procurement strategy development in the public sector: An empirical study of the UK. Journal of Public Procurement, 2(1), 41–61.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Gongich, D. G., Kisule, F., & salongo, kateregga. (2025). Relationship between bid preparation audit and service delivery in the education sector of Central Equatoria State, South Sudan. A cross-sectional study. SJ Insights, 2(10), 9. https://doi.org/10.51168/insights.v2i10.41

Issue

Section

Section of Humanities

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.