Human wildlife conflicts in Uganda: A Case of Queen Elizabeth National Park

Authors

  • John Bosco Nuwe Institute of Tourism and Hospitality, Department of Tourism Management, P.O. Box 317, Kabale, Uganda.
  • Winfred Sila College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi. P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/insights.v2i10.50

Keywords:

Human-wildlife conflict, Biodiversity conservation, Illegal wildlife hunting, Illegal charcoal burning, Death of wildlife.

Abstract

Introduction

The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of HWC in the Ishasha region, Southwestern Uganda. This study was guided by specific objectives, namely, identifying the root causes of HWC, assessing the effects of HWC, and determining the measures to mitigate HWC in the Ishasha region.

Methodology

The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional design utilizing quantitative data collection and analysis methods. Using simple random and purposive sampling techniques, 109 respondents were selected to participate in the study.  This study used questionnaires and interviews with key informants to collect data.

Results

The main causes of human-wildlife conflict were found to be the need to meet hunters' personal needs (36.7%), illegally harvested charcoal for commercial production (20.2%), perceived injustice (18.3%), commercial hunting and bushmeat trade (15.6%). And droughts, bushfires, and climate change, 9.2% each. Human-wildlife conflict accounts for 32% of reported human and wildlife deaths and injuries, 28% of agricultural devastation, 24% of poverty, and 16% of human deaths. The study findings revealed that the measures used to mitigate human-animal conflict in the Ishasha region were the use of indigenous knowledge (48.6% of respondents), non-electric fences (33%) and police patrols (18.3% of respondents). The majority of respondents cited human and wildlife death and injury as impacts of human-wildlife conflict in the Ishasha region. Therefore, the local communities use non-electric fences to reduce the impact of animals intruding on people's crops in the area.

Conclusion

Indigenous knowledge is the most effective measure to mitigate HWC in the Ishasha region, highlighting the importance of using traditional practices and community-based solutions.

Recommendation

It is important for the various institutions to assess the effectiveness of existing policies and identify opportunities for policy reform to address the root causes of the conflict and promote sustainable coexistence between humans and wildlife.

References

Ahmadi, S., Maman, S., Zoumenou, R., Massougbodji, A., Cot, M., Glorennec, P., & Bodeau-Livinec, F. (2018). Hunting, sale, and consumption of bushmeat killed by Lead-Based ammunition in Benin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061140 PMid:29857592 PMCid:PMC6025093

Amara, E., Adhikari, H., Heiskanen, J., Siljander, M., Munyao, M., Omondi, P., & Pellikka, P. (2020). Aboveground Biomass Distribution in a Multi-Use Savannah Landscape in Southeastern Kenya: Impact of Land Use and Fences. Land, 9(10), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100381

Anderson, J., & Bausch, C. (2006). Climate change and natural disasters: Scientific evidence of a possible relation between recent natural disasters and climate change. Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy, 2, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00302.x PMid:16512857

Attia, T. S. N., Martin, T. N., Forbuzie, T. P., Angwafo, T. E., & Chuo, M. D. (2018). Human Wildlife Conflict: Causes, Consequences and Management Strategies in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region, Cameroon. Int J For Anim Fish Res, 2, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijfaf.2.2.1

Authority, U. W. (2017). Queen Elizabeth National Park.

Becker, M., McRobb, R., Watson, F., Droge, E., Kanyembo, B., Murdoch, J., & Kakumbi, C. (2013). Evaluating wire-snare poaching trends and the impacts of by-catch on elephants and large carnivores. Biological Conservation, 158, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.017

Digun-Aweto, O., & Van Der Merwe, P. (2019). Community perceptions of the human-wildlife conflict: a case study of Old Oyo National Park, Nigeria. Biodiversity, 20(2-3), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2019.1664323

Gulati, S., Karanth, K. K., Le, N. A., & Noack, F. (2021). Human casualties are the dominant cost of human-wildlife conflict in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921338118 PMid:33593892 PMCid:PMC7923352

Haruna, K. K., & Rusoke, T. (2019). Evaluation of Man-Lion Conflicts on Conservation Status of Lions (Panthera leo) in Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP), Kasese district, Western Uganda.

Hill, C., Osborn, F., & Plumptre, A. J. (2002). Human-wildlife conflict: Identifying the problem and possible solutions.

Horgan, F. G., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2020). Farming on the edge: Farmer training to mitigate human-wildlife conflict at an agricultural frontier in south Sri Lanka. Crop Protection, 127, 104981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104981

Kate, K. (2012). Possible strategies/practices in reducing wild animal (Primate) crop raids in unprotected areas in Hoima District. A Report to the Poverty and Conservation Learning Group (PCLG), Uganda.

Kolinski, L., & Milich, K. M. (2021). Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Impacts Community Perceptions around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Diversity, 13(4), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040145

Lautensach, A., & Lautensach, S. (2020). Our War Against Nature: Letters from the Front. Human Security in World Affairs: Problems and Opportunities (2nd Edition).

Lister, D. (2018). Wildlife Crime and Monitoring: Applications for Ranger-Collected Data. University of York.

Mallya, I. P. (2017). Assessment of Human-Elephant Conflicts in Vilima Vitatu Village in Babati District: North Eastern Tanzania. The Open University of Tanzania.

Massé, F. (2020). Conservation law enforcement: policing protected areas. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(3), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1630249

Mekonen, S. (2020). Coexistence between human and wildlife: the nature, causes, and mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Ecology, 20(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00319-1 PMid:32928171 PMCid:PMC7489024

Mukeka, J. M., Ogutu, J. O., Kanga, E., & Roskaft, E. (2018). Characteristics of human-wildlife conflicts in Kenya: Examples of Tsavo and Maasai Mara Regions. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 8(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v8n3p148

Muthee, D., Kilemba, G., & Masinde, J. (2019). The role of indigenous knowledge systems in enhancing agricultural productivity in Kenya. Eastern Africa Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(1), 34-35.

Osborn, F. V., & Anstey, S. (2002). Elephant/human conflict and community development around the Niassa Reserve, Mozambique. Consultancy for WWF/SARPO.

Osei-Owusu, Y. (2018). Human-Wildlife Conflict: Elephants-Technical Manual.

Palminteri, S. (2016). Hot stuff: improving chili fence effectiveness (in protecting crops from elephants).

Rossi, A. (2018). Uganda Wildlife Trafficking Assessment. TRAFFIC Report, TRAFFIC International. Cambridge: UK.

UBOS, S. (2014). Uganda Bureau of Statistics. The National Population and Housing Census.

Virtanen, P., Macandza, V., Goba, P., Mourinho, J., Roque, D., Mamugy, F., & Langa, B. (2021). Assessing tolerance for wildlife: human-elephant conflict in Chimanimani, Mozambique. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 26(5), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1834648

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Nuwe, J. B., & Winfred Sila. (2025). Human wildlife conflicts in Uganda: A Case of Queen Elizabeth National Park. SJ Insights, 2(10), 9. https://doi.org/10.51168/insights.v2i10.50

Issue

Section

Section of Humanities

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.